Choosing a DAB radio

Jon Sawer needs to upgrade his old but dearly loved radio and wants to buy a high-spec DAB radio

I’m about to reluctantly upgrade from my existing extremely old but dearly loved radio. I’m intending to spend as much as I can afford on a top range, high specification standalone DAB radio. You have in the past published many articles on the subject on the UK DAB radio format and how you consider this to be inferior to the European model being developed, and I don’t really wish to make an error in my purchase when shopping around.
Jon Sawer

You can’t really buy decent standalone radios any more, unless you want a portable of the sort often called a “kitchen radio”. Above that are “tabletop radios” that usually include other functions. The main features are FM and DAB digital radios, a connection for an MP3 player (often an iPod dock), and internet or Wi-Fi radio. Some have CD players and some have hard drives for storing music files. Finally there are “lifestyle” or microsystems that are actually mini hi-fi units with separate speakers. You’ll have to decide which kind of system best fits your needs, and your budget.

This diversity reflects changes in the way people listen to music.
Radio now comes from a variety of sources, including thousands of internet radio stations. Also, many people now listen to music files from their portable music players or PC hard drives, not just to CDs and cassette tapes. The most common factor is FM radio, because it’s cheap and because FM radio’s network coverage is still much better than DAB’s.

Portable DAB/FM radios tend to be mono and have “retro” (old fashioned) designs. The top-of-the-range model in this class is the Pure Digital Evoke-2S (from about £130), which has a smart veneered finish. It’s also a proper stereo radio, although the speakers are too close together to create much of a stereo effect. It has the usual telescopic aerial but you can unscrew it and use something more capable if you live in a weak signal area.

There’s a very similar Pure Evoke-3 model (from £154), which can record to SD memory cards and also comes with a remote control. However, it doesn’t say it’s upgradeable to DAB+ (see below), so you’ll need to check. A cheaper alternative is the “piano black” Roberts Sound 80 (£85), which has a downward-facing bass woofer of the sort more common on tabletop designs.

Tabletop radios are trending towards a boxy design exemplified by the Roberts MP43 Sound 43 (CD/DAB/FM/Dock, £180). The Monitor Audio AirStream 10 (£224) is a more stylish and distinctive unit that also includes Wi-Fi and Ethernet connections. Pure’s challenger is the Avanti Flow Table-top Digital Music System (£228), which also has a downward facing 5.25 inch subwoofer. However, the one to beat is the award-winning Vita Audio R2i (Walnut finish, £280), which has a reputation for its sound quality.

Microsystems attempt to deliver hi-fi, or something close to hi-fi, without the overhead of having a large stack of units and speakers on stands. For a very long time, small silver Denon CD/radio receivers have been the ones to buy, though the line has been challenged by Onkyo and others in the value-for-money stakes. The Denon RCD M38 (up to £300) is the latest model, and it now supports USB playback and DAB+ as well as DAB and FM. It’s also available for £200 without the two small SC-M37 speakers usually supplied. This allows you to spend a bit more on better speakers.

There are dozens of small bookshelf speakers on the UK market including the Q Acoustics 2010 and 2020, Tannoy F1 Custom, Monitor Audio BR1 and Mordaunt Short Aviano. They are heavily discounted if you shop around, though in the long run, it’s better to buy from a dealer who will let you listen to them first. Most sound much better on stands, but you can use four generous blobs of Blu-Tack to lift each speaker off a shelf.
Sony also offers a lot of “mini hi-fi” systems at low prices. The Sony CMTBX77DBI (CD/DAB/FM/Dock, £130) provides the advantages of separate loudspeakers and room-filling sound for less than the cost of many portable radios.

I’ve quoted current prices from Amazon.co.uk for convenience, and this is also a good site for checking star ratings and user reviews. You can also use TestSeek.co.uk to find magazine and website reviews of most products before shopping around.

In terms of future-proofing your purchase, the main thing is to look for support for DAB+. This is the relatively new digital radio standard that is replacing the old and inefficient DAB system currently used in the UK. Of course, there are no plans to use DAB+ in the UK at the moment, and even DAB+ will never see the global adoption enjoyed by FM. However, it is painfully obvious that DAB is floundering in the UK, and DAB+ provides the chance to offer higher sound quality, more channels and lower transmission costs than DAB so ultimately it cannot be avoided.

This doesn’t mean DAB would be phased out immediately: DAB+ is backwards-compatible so the two would co-exist while 10m DAB sets drop out of use. Before there’s a switchover from FM to DAB, digital radio listening must reach 50%, and national coverage has to match FM coverage. There is zero chance of digital radio listening reaching 50% by 2013, let alone that being DAB digital radio. Indeed, the number of FM radios is still growing much faster than the number of DAB radios, because FM is also appearing in mobile phones and MP3 players. There’s also very little chance of DAB matching FM coverage in time: that would require the BBC to spend more than £100m on building out the network. (The government isn’t going to pay for it directly, and commercial radio doesn’t have the money.)

But it may never happen. If the government thinks it can make perhaps 150m FM radios redundant then it’s in for a very rude shock. (Technically, FM will never be switched off: the plan is to use it for “hyperlocal radio” – presumably schools, hospital radio, community stations etc.)

However, as I’ve pointed out before, Lord Carter’s Digital Britain report said: “To prepare for any such change or additional upgrade we will work to ensure that digital radio receivers sold in the UK are at least compliant with the WorldDMB receiver profile 1; which includes DAB+ and DMB-A.” This prepares the way for moving beyond DAB, though I suspect it had more to do with the European Broadcasting Union’s desire to find a standard that would actually work across Europe.

You could, of course, wait for radios that support WorldDMB receiver profile 1 (PDF), but don’t hold your breath.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Apple’s Ping succumbs to the spammers

New social network built inside iTunes fails to keep out the spammers, showing a curse of social media – even inside proprietorial walls

Apple chief Steve Jobs’s trumpeting of the 160 million credit card holders on iTunes was a siren call to spammers. As if they needed any invitation.

The most common incidence of scamming on Apple’s latest social venture, Ping, is the offering of free iPhones from a dodgy URL. These avatar-less lurkers are mostly hanging around Ping’s more famous participants – Katy Perry, for instance.

As MacRumors points out, no credit card details are needed to sign up for an iTunes Store account – the requisite accreditation for joining Ping – which would appear the spammers’ way in.

“[Ping] implements no spam or URL filtering,” says internet security firm Sophos, adding that the service is “drowning in scams and spams”.

And it appears that Ping has also received a touch of the early-day Twitter, musician Ben Folds last night saying that an account had been created in his name. Verified accounts, Mr Jobs? (And are you sure those were Jack Johnson’s tour photos? Was that really Coldplay’s Chris Martin on stage on Wednesday?)

Graham Clulely, senior technology consultant at Sophos, said: “We’re used to survey scams like this being spread far and wide via sites like Facebook, but clearly the lack of filtering on Ping is making it a brand new playground for the bad guys to operate in.

“It’s ironic that the most common scams on Ping right now revolve around Apple’s own iPhone. It’s safe to assume that Ping does incorporate some rudimentary filtering to prevent offensive messages from being posted, so hopefully Apple’s security team can extend this to also block scam messages and malicious links. In the meantime, though, Ping users should be wary of believing what they read on the new service.”

Remember back in 2009 when Twitter was plagued by spammers? This is what happened when the site announced a declaration of war on spam in October last year:

Sophos also say the iTunes 10 update fixes 13 “separate vulnerabilities” in the components used to render the iTunes interface.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Another data win: TfL opens up bus and tube timetables for developers

Lobbying by London Mayor Boris Johnson has paid off once more – and put the city further forward in the open data stakes


Tube train, on time. Photo by fabbio on Flickr. Some rights reserved

Want to get the bus and underground timetables, in a zippy XML format? You can, right now, via the London Datastore.

As the page explains, “The data available in the attached zip file consists of almost 800 xml files, with each relating to a particular service i.e. one per tube line, bus route, riverboat route, dlr route etc. Each xml file contains the following data elements: StopPoints; RouteSections; Routes; JourneyPatternSections; Operators; Services; VehicleJourneys.”

Getting this data out hasn’t been a trivial task – and my understanding is that it’s been down to persistent lobbying from the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, himself.

This is another significant tranche of data to come out of TfL – an organisation that for years has been seen by developers and some within the Greater London Assembly as something of a black box; as one person put it to me, “you pour money in at one end and you get transport out at the other, but you’re not allowed to see inside it.” Previously, TfL released data about locations of bus stops, and then some real-time data about movements of tube trains – which led, you’ll recall, to Matthew Somerville’s live tube train map. (Unfortunately, the API for that has been suspended: it couldn’t cope with 10m hits per week, and hasn’t come back since June. Ahem, ahem, TfL.)

You can see all the London transport-related datasets via the London Datastore. With Johnson pushing it, though, light is starting to shine inside TfL.

By far the most successful demonstration of the power of making data free though has come from the London Cycle Hire scheme – where you can now get real-time information about availability of bicycles for hire, by location, in apps for Android and iPhone.

But if we can now add information about bus and tubes to apps like that, we’re getting closer to the point where TfL really is being run for the citizens of London, rather than (as many bureaucracies are) for its staff. The distinction is a fine one – most organisations think of themselves as having their users’ best interests at heart; the difference is that when you can get feedback, then the organisation may discover things about their users that they never knew.

There’s still some way to go with TfL: for example, it collects data about how many cars pass particular points (using induction loops in the road) which is used for traffic light timing; that’s data that many developers would love to get their hands, or processors, on. You never know: if the pressure continues, it might come too.

You might think that Boris Johnson’s presence pushing this along is just a bit of grandstanding, but that wouldn’t be correct. He’s actually been in the vanguard of politicians introducing open data. If you have a long memory for public data-related stories, you’ll recall that he did a rather neat end-run around the Labour administration’s Home Office in 2008, when as part of his manifesto while running for the office of London mayor he declared that he would publish crime maps.

We were a little sceptical on the Free Our Data blog, although the blocking attitude of the police and the Information Commissioner’s Office did nudge us towards Johnson’s side.

Johnson did go on to publish them, and London has been in the forefront of cities which have tried to do innovative things with the data that its local government and authorities collect. First came the London Datastore, launched in January. Then came the datasets. And that brings us to the present day. For the many who don’t live in London, this might all seem academic – but really the Datastore, and the political impetus behind it, are examples for the rest of the country that making data open and reusable actually can have a benefit. Would the Bike Scheme be as useful if you couldn’t find out availability easily? Probably not. And once the TfL timetables have been processed, someone is sure to have a smart use for them.

Can’t wait, personally. Overall, 2010 has already been a fantastic year – possibly the best ever – for making data free: first the London Datastore, then the Ordnance Survey OpenData release in April, and now the drive by central government to get both central and local government to publish data (soon to include the text of contracts) about spending. Results don’t come much better than that.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Texas Probes Google’s Search Engine

Google said the Texas attorney general’s office is conducting an antitrust review of the Web giant’s core search-engine business, another sign of growing government scrutiny of the company.
more… WSJ.com: Technology

Blogging News Stories as They Happen in Real Life

Blogging News Stories as They Happen in Real Life

Blogging news stories as they unfold is one of the most

exciting and controversial applications of technology

that bloggers have discovered. One thing that makes the

blogosphere so active is the fact that it is possible to

update a blog instantaneously, so the news on blogs

tends to be more current than the news in the paper, or

on television. Unlike news delivered by these other

media, news that appears on blogs does not have to

travel through a series of editors and administrators

before it reaches the public eye. This has some

advantages, and some distinct disadvantages.

One of the most notable cases of news hitting a blog

before appearing in other media took place in July 2005

when terrorism struck London. As passengers were

evacuated from a subway car near an explosion, one

man took several photographs of the scene with his

cellular phone, and within an hour these images were

posted online. First-person accounts of the catastrophe

began appearing on blogs soon after these photos

appeared, and people all over the world learned about

the events in London by reading the words and seeing

the photos posted by bloggers.

The fact that these stories and images were being spread

directly by individuals operating without the added

filter of a reporter helped to make the crisis feel very

immediate to people across the globe. When it comes to

blogging, news often appears in a very personal context.

This has the potential to be the beginning of an exciting

new era of reporting, one that takes “New Journalism”

to it’s logical next step by putting the power to shape

how the news is written and read directly into the hands

of the public.

Many bloggers and cultural commentators who are champions

of the weblog movement feel that this growing trend of ind-

ividuals who are getting their news from blogs is a good thing, because it makes the flow of information more democratic. By decentralizing the control of news, blogs allow more voices to enter the field of debate about important current events.

However, many people are adamantly opposed to the use of

blogs as news outlets, and there are plenty of good arguments

on this side of the debate. Unlike newspapers or tv stations,

few blogs have fact-checkers, and there is little attention paid

to journalistic accountability on many blogs. This can lead to

the rapid spread of misinformation, and more than one false

report has taken the blogosphere by storm. The questions

about whether blogging news as it happens is ethical or not

are very complicated, but no matter where you stand on the

topic of current events blogs you are almost sure to agree

that this movement has the potential to revolutionize how

modern people get their news.

Blogging for Profit Begins With a Long Term Plan

Many people dream of blogging for profit, and this goal is not far beyond the reach of someone with average intelligence, a willingness to work hard, and a basic grasp of blogging tech. However, very few people manage to reap the profits they want from their own blogs. Most people who attempt to make money with their blogs do not succeed for two reasons.

Often, bloggers have unrealistic expectations of how fast their

readership will grow and how much money they will make, and when these expectations are not met the disappointment can crush the desire to continue blogging. The other trap that many bloggers fall into has to do with lack of planning. If you want to turn a profit as a blogger, the key to success is to make a real

life plan and stick with it.

To succeed at blogging for profit, the main thing that you will

need is a large readership. The higher your traffic, the more advertisers will agree to pay you.

However, cultivating the regular visitors that you will need in

order to make a profit isn’t easy. As more and more blogs

each day, having a great idea or a wonderful writing style is

no longer enough to get attention. You need to be able to

market your blog effectively.

Too many bloggers spend all of their time writing posts and

almost no time marketing their project. To be certain, updating

as often as you can is a great way to keep your blog high on

blogrolls and high in blog search engines like technorati,

and once your readers know that you update frequently they

will return to your site on a regular basis.

However, it does not matter how often you update if nobody

is reading your page, so don’t skimp on the time that you

spend drawing visitors to your site. To make your dreams

of blogging for profit a reality, try decreasing your number

of posts and using some of that time to draw new visitors

by setting up link exchanges with other bloggers, making

contacts in the blog community, and following other

established modes of winning traffic.

Of course, even if you are a marketing genius or have a really

great idea for a blog, success is not going to happen overnight.

Building the kind of readership that blogging for profit requires

takes a lot of time, and in all likelihood it will be at least several

months before you are able to turn much of a profit. Try to stay

committed to your blogging project during this initial rough

period. To stay motivated, set goals for how often you will update and how many readers you want to attract, and then reward yourself for sticking with your plan.

Jackson Bleu is very knowledgeable in the online world for business or pleasure. He has and will continue testing all the curves put forward by the big search engines online. Check him out at one of his sites: Seldom Rest, Do You?

Another data win: TfL opens up bus and tube timetables for developers

Lobbying by London Mayor Boris Johnson has paid off once more – and put the city further forward in the open data stakes


Tube train, on time. Photo by fabbio on Flickr. Some rights reserved

Want to get the bus and underground timetables, in a zippy XML format? You can, right now, via the London Datastore.

As the page explains, “The data available in the attached zip file consists of almost 800 xml files, with each relating to a particular service i.e. one per tube line, bus route, riverboat route, dlr route etc. Each xml file contains the following data elements: StopPoints; RouteSections; Routes; JourneyPatternSections; Operators; Services; VehicleJourneys.”

Getting this data out hasn’t been a trivial task – and my understanding is that it’s been down to persistent lobbying from the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, himself.

This is another significant tranche of data to come out of TfL – an organisation that for years has been seen by developers and some within the Greater London Assembly as something of a black box; as one person put it to me, “you pour money in at one end and you get transport out at the other, but you’re not allowed to see inside it.” Previously, TfL released data about locations of bus stops, and then some real-time data about movements of tube trains – which led, you’ll recall, to Matthew Somerville’s live tube train map. (Unfortunately, the API for that has been suspended: it couldn’t cope with 10m hits per week, and hasn’t come back since June. Ahem, ahem, TfL.)

You can see all the London transport-related datasets via the London Datastore. With Johnson pushing it, though, light is starting to shine inside TfL.

By far the most successful demonstration of the power of making data free though has come from the London Cycle Hire scheme – where you can now get real-time information about availability of bicycles for hire, by location, in apps for Android and iPhone.

But if we can now add information about bus and tubes to apps like that, we’re getting closer to the point where TfL really is being run for the citizens of London, rather than (as many bureaucracies are) for its staff. The distinction is a fine one – most organisations think of themselves as having their users’ best interests at heart; the difference is that when you can get feedback, then the organisation may discover things about their users that they never knew.

There’s still some way to go with TfL: for example, it collects data about how many cars pass particular points (using induction loops in the road) which is used for traffic light timing; that’s data that many developers would love to get their hands, or processors, on. You never know: if the pressure continues, it might come too.

You might think that Boris Johnson’s presence pushing this along is just a bit of grandstanding, but that wouldn’t be correct. He’s actually been in the vanguard of politicians introducing open data. If you have a long memory for public data-related stories, you’ll recall that he did a rather neat end-run around the Labour administration’s Home Office in 2008, when as part of his manifesto while running for the office of London mayor he declared that he would publish crime maps.

We were a little sceptical on the Free Our Data blog, although the blocking attitude of the police and the Information Commissioner’s Office did nudge us towards Johnson’s side.

Johnson did go on to publish them, and London has been in the forefront of cities which have tried to do innovative things with the data that its local government and authorities collect. First came the London Datastore, launched in January. Then came the datasets. And that brings us to the present day. For the many who don’t live in London, this might all seem academic – but really the Datastore, and the political impetus behind it, are examples for the rest of the country that making data open and reusable actually can have a benefit. Would the Bike Scheme be as useful if you couldn’t find out availability easily? Probably not. And once the TfL timetables have been processed, someone is sure to have a smart use for them.

Can’t wait, personally. Overall, 2010 has already been a fantastic year – possibly the best ever – for making data free: first the London Datastore, then the Ordnance Survey OpenData release in April, and now the drive by central government to get both central and local government to publish data (soon to include the text of contracts) about spending. Results don’t come much better than that.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Another data win: TfL opens up bus and tube timetables for developers

Lobbying by London Mayor Boris Johnson has paid off once more – and put the city further forward in the open data stakes


Tube train, on time. Photo by fabbio on Flickr. Some rights reserved

Want to get the bus and underground timetables, in a zippy XML format? You can, right now, via the London Datastore.

As the page explains, “The data available in the attached zip file consists of almost 800 xml files, with each relating to a particular service i.e. one per tube line, bus route, riverboat route, dlr route etc. Each xml file contains the following data elements: StopPoints; RouteSections; Routes; JourneyPatternSections; Operators; Services; VehicleJourneys.”

Getting this data out hasn’t been a trivial task – and my understanding is that it’s been down to persistent lobbying from the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, himself.

This is another significant tranche of data to come out of TfL – an organisation that for years has been seen by developers and some within the Greater London Assembly as something of a black box; as one person put it to me, “you pour money in at one end and you get transport out at the other, but you’re not allowed to see inside it.” Previously, TfL released data about locations of bus stops, and then some real-time data about movements of tube trains – which led, you’ll recall, to Matthew Somerville’s live tube train map. (Unfortunately, the API for that has been suspended: it couldn’t cope with 10m hits per week, and hasn’t come back since June. Ahem, ahem, TfL.)

You can see all the London transport-related datasets via the London Datastore. With Johnson pushing it, though, light is starting to shine inside TfL.

By far the most successful demonstration of the power of making data free though has come from the London Cycle Hire scheme – where you can now get real-time information about availability of bicycles for hire, by location, in apps for Android and iPhone.

But if we can now add information about bus and tubes to apps like that, we’re getting closer to the point where TfL really is being run for the citizens of London, rather than (as many bureaucracies are) for its staff. The distinction is a fine one – most organisations think of themselves as having their users’ best interests at heart; the difference is that when you can get feedback, then the organisation may discover things about their users that they never knew.

There’s still some way to go with TfL: for example, it collects data about how many cars pass particular points (using induction loops in the road) which is used for traffic light timing; that’s data that many developers would love to get their hands, or processors, on. You never know: if the pressure continues, it might come too.

You might think that Boris Johnson’s presence pushing this along is just a bit of grandstanding, but that wouldn’t be correct. He’s actually been in the vanguard of politicians introducing open data. If you have a long memory for public data-related stories, you’ll recall that he did a rather neat end-run around the Labour administration’s Home Office in 2008, when as part of his manifesto while running for the office of London mayor he declared that he would publish crime maps.

We were a little sceptical on the Free Our Data blog, although the blocking attitude of the police and the Information Commissioner’s Office did nudge us towards Johnson’s side.

Johnson did go on to publish them, and London has been in the forefront of cities which have tried to do innovative things with the data that its local government and authorities collect. First came the London Datastore, launched in January. Then came the datasets. And that brings us to the present day. For the many who don’t live in London, this might all seem academic – but really the Datastore, and the political impetus behind it, are examples for the rest of the country that making data open and reusable actually can have a benefit. Would the Bike Scheme be as useful if you couldn’t find out availability easily? Probably not. And once the TfL timetables have been processed, someone is sure to have a smart use for them.

Can’t wait, personally. Overall, 2010 has already been a fantastic year – possibly the best ever – for making data free: first the London Datastore, then the Ordnance Survey OpenData release in April, and now the drive by central government to get both central and local government to publish data (soon to include the text of contracts) about spending. Results don’t come much better than that.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Another data win: TfL opens up bus and tube timetables for developers

Lobbying by London Mayor Boris Johnson has paid off once more – and put the city further forward in the open data stakes


Tube train, on time. Photo by fabbio on Flickr. Some rights reserved

Want to get the bus and underground timetables, in a zippy XML format? You can, right now, via the London Datastore.

As the page explains, “The data available in the attached zip file consists of almost 800 xml files, with each relating to a particular service i.e. one per tube line, bus route, riverboat route, dlr route etc. Each xml file contains the following data elements: StopPoints; RouteSections; Routes; JourneyPatternSections; Operators; Services; VehicleJourneys.”

Getting this data out hasn’t been a trivial task – and my understanding is that it’s been down to persistent lobbying from the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, himself.

This is another significant tranche of data to come out of TfL – an organisation that for years has been seen by developers and some within the Greater London Assembly as something of a black box; as one person put it to me, “you pour money in at one end and you get transport out at the other, but you’re not allowed to see inside it.” Previously, TfL released data about locations of bus stops, and then some real-time data about movements of tube trains – which led, you’ll recall, to Matthew Somerville’s live tube train map. (Unfortunately, the API for that has been suspended: it couldn’t cope with 10m hits per week, and hasn’t come back since June. Ahem, ahem, TfL.)

You can see all the London transport-related datasets via the London Datastore. With Johnson pushing it, though, light is starting to shine inside TfL.

By far the most successful demonstration of the power of making data free though has come from the London Cycle Hire scheme – where you can now get real-time information about availability of bicycles for hire, by location, in apps for Android and iPhone.

But if we can now add information about bus and tubes to apps like that, we’re getting closer to the point where TfL really is being run for the citizens of London, rather than (as many bureaucracies are) for its staff. The distinction is a fine one – most organisations think of themselves as having their users’ best interests at heart; the difference is that when you can get feedback, then the organisation may discover things about their users that they never knew.

There’s still some way to go with TfL: for example, it collects data about how many cars pass particular points (using induction loops in the road) which is used for traffic light timing; that’s data that many developers would love to get their hands, or processors, on. You never know: if the pressure continues, it might come too.

You might think that Boris Johnson’s presence pushing this along is just a bit of grandstanding, but that wouldn’t be correct. He’s actually been in the vanguard of politicians introducing open data. If you have a long memory for public data-related stories, you’ll recall that he did a rather neat end-run around the Labour administration’s Home Office in 2008, when as part of his manifesto while running for the office of London mayor he declared that he would publish crime maps.

We were a little sceptical on the Free Our Data blog, although the blocking attitude of the police and the Information Commissioner’s Office did nudge us towards Johnson’s side.

Johnson did go on to publish them, and London has been in the forefront of cities which have tried to do innovative things with the data that its local government and authorities collect. First came the London Datastore, launched in January. Then came the datasets. And that brings us to the present day. For the many who don’t live in London, this might all seem academic – but really the Datastore, and the political impetus behind it, are examples for the rest of the country that making data open and reusable actually can have a benefit. Would the Bike Scheme be as useful if you couldn’t find out availability easily? Probably not. And once the TfL timetables have been processed, someone is sure to have a smart use for them.

Can’t wait, personally. Overall, 2010 has already been a fantastic year – possibly the best ever – for making data free: first the London Datastore, then the Ordnance Survey OpenData release in April, and now the drive by central government to get both central and local government to publish data (soon to include the text of contracts) about spending. Results don’t come much better than that.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

PS3 hack escapes court challenge

Sony has won a permanent ban in Australia of a hack for its PS3, but the code behind it has been released for free on the web.
more… BBC News – Technology

Samsung Galaxy Tab: What the analysts are saying

Samsung’s new tablet computer signals an understanding that it takes more than hardware to be successful, say analysts

Samsung’s new Android-powered tablet computer, the Galaxy Tab, has been well-received by industry analysts – even though full pricing details have still not been released.

The Tab, launched at the IFA show in Berlin, is expected to herald a charge against the early success of the Apple iPad. Consumers should benefit, with a price war predicted to kick off in 2011.

Here’s some of the early reaction.

Ben Wood, director of research at CCS Insight

Apple has legitimised the tablet category with its iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab sees the tier-one brand go head-to-head with Steve Jobs’ creation.

Samsung is betting big on the tablet category with this device. It’s the first major manufacturer to unveil a device targeting this segment but we expect a flurry of further announcement from an array of other players.

The Galaxy Tab signals Samsung’s understanding that it takes more than hardware to be successful. Allowing access to books, music and films is a major step forward as it ratchets up its competitive positioning against Apple.

The 7in form-factor is very compelling. Rumours abound that Apple is evaluating a similar device footprint for future iterations of the iPad to sit alongside its 9.7in older brother.

Success will depend on pricing. If positioned carefully, the Galaxy Tab could emerge as an operator-friendly alternative to Apple’s iPad as it could be subsidised (with a contract) to extremely ultra low price points in the run up to the lucrative holiday sales season.

This is the first of a torrent of Android tablets we expect to be launched in coming weeks. At the low end, it’s going to be a complete bloodbath as no-name brands race to the bottom of the price curve.

Carolina Milanesi, research vice-president at Gartner

The Galaxy Tab builds on the success that the Galaxy S [mobile phone] has been having since its launch in June. With a 7in display, front and back camera, 16GB and 32GB storage plus SD card and a price tag of around €600 (£500) before subsidy, the Galaxy Tab offers a good solution for those users that have been thinking about getting a tablet but were waiting for something more price competitive.

Samsung will have about 200 apps at launch that will be dedicated to the Galaxy Tab. All apps in its Markets application store will, of course, run as well. But if the iPad experience is anything to go by, it will be dedicated apps that will make the difference. It will be also interesting to see what will be the consumers’ response to the subsidised model. The flexibility that you can have with iPad – where, in the UK, I can buy a day pass for 3G, or a week or a month – has had a lot of success with consumers who do not feel they have signed up their life yet to another contract.

All that said, the recent Ofcom report on the UK shows that the trend for the 24-month contract is growing. Subsidy on hardware is still what consumers see rather than total cost of ownership.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2010 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds



more… Technology news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

ADVERTISEMENT

Anmelden - BlogNews Theme by Gabfire themes